Tuesday 31 July 2012

Two iPhone Panorama apps Compared (Photosynth, DMD Panorama)

I have two panorama photo apps on my iPhone so the other day I decided to test them with a couple of views each taken on both apps.  The apps in question are Photosynth, a free app from Microsoft, and DMD Panorama produced by Dermandar. £1.49 at the time of writing though the price does drop to free from time to time. Both are available for download in the iTunes app store. Both apps automatically take the series of shots and stitch the result automatically with no opportunity for the photographer to have any say in what is going on.
These panoramas are exactly as produced by the apps on my iPhone4.

First view taken at the end of my lane where the track peters out to arable fields.

Photosynth:
2012-07-29 12.38.27-2

DMD Panorama:
2012-07-29 12.42.39

The second view is across the field from the lane which is about two feet below the level of the field:

Photosynth:
2012-07-29 12.41.56-2

DMD Panorama:
2012-07-29 12.43.33

The first thing which stands out is the difficulty I had keeping the phone level for each shot with DMD Panorama. This results in an uneven horizon which should have been virtually flat in both views. The reason for this is the way each app is presented on screen while taking the panorama.

Photosynth shows what has been taken in a white rectangle and the latest view in a green rectangle. The idea is to keep the rectangles level with each other. As you move round the white rectangle moves and when the green dot meets the edge of the white rectangle the next photo is taken. I find it easy to concentrate on the rectangles and keep them reasonable well lined up. Also they are easy to see in bright conditions.
P1030964

By contrast DMP Panorama shows only the present full view. Near the top of the screen are Yin and Yang symbols. These move together as you rotate the phone and the next photo is taken when they meet up. The problem I found was they were very hard to see against a bright sky and concentrating on those it was hard to keep the phone level with the resulting uneven horizon. There are text warning on screen about keeping the phone vertical but they are hard to read in bright light and I found them distracting.
P1030965

From the point of view of ease of use I found Photosynth better - but - it did make a mess on stitching the sky on the second panorama view. This could be easily 'fixed' with a bit of Photoshopping but it would have been nice if the app had done a better job here. All in all though there is little to grumble about with Photosynth considering it is always a free app.

10 comments:

  1. Amazing....to think it is only a few years ago that one had to provide software with anchor points to stitch images.
    I will stick with Photoshop for now but these are pretty good and better for being free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can remember trying to find anchor points and gave up at that time. Auto stitching is coming on with leaps and bounds.
      The iPhone panoramas don't compare on quality compared with a DSLR but the pixel count is a lot less with Apple products - their main failing. OK for blog use but no good for large enlargements.

      Delete
  2. All very technical John, but very good as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Roy. Hopefully it may be of some use to anyone thinking of using these apps.

      Delete
  3. Looking at the two side by side, I think the Photosynth does a better job.
    Both amazing though, when you think of the work involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I prefer to use Photosynth. The abilities of some programs (and their programmers) is quite outstanding these days.

      Delete
  4. Hi John, sorry to have missed some of your posts but we have been trying to have a bit of a holiday while the weather was good and getting out and about which has put me behind with commenting on daily blog posts.

    I think I'm with Keith in that I prefer the Photosynth version, not that I'm any judge of such things!

    Going back to your previous posts, I enjoyed seeing your damselfly and the inquisitive juvenile GT. I particularly enjoyed the lovely photos of the gorgeous toad. We used to have them in the garden some years ago but not lately. Nice capture of the little Coal Tit too :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jan, No problem, it is a hobby and you are not expected to look at and comment on everything. It is nice to get out on the few really nice days this year. We have to grab the opportunities while we can.

      Delete
  5. I have tried several different photo stitchers over the last couple of years but have now settled on Microsoft Research Image Composition Editor (Microsoft ICE). It seems consistently to do a better job than any of the others - and it's free! Download from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ice/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I used that a few years ago. A good simple one I use is Serif PanoramaPlus 2 which is free.

      Delete

Thank you for visiting. Hope you enjoyed the pictures. Any comment, or correction to any information or identification I get wrong, is most welcome. John

Related Posts with Thumbnails